Search for: "State v. Schlesinger "
Results 61 - 80
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2010, 9:17 am
(On this point, see Rudolf Schlesinger's book on Federalism in East Central Europe, at pp 47-66). [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 10:05 pm
Harding appointed Charles Evans Hughes as Secretary of State and commuted the sentence of Eugene V. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 12:58 pm
Ellison, Ann V. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am
Co. v Farrell, 57 AD3d 721 [2d Dept 2008]). [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:50 am
” Mosher-Simons v County of Allegany, 99 NY2d 214, 219 (2002), quoting Tarfer v State oflVew York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 (1986). [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
The court supported this argument with a citation to United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
” Exercising her greater appellate prerogative, Justice Richter did not merely downgrade as dicta (as did Justice Schlesinger) the First Department’s acceptance of jurisdiction in Hospital Diagnostic, but confronted it head-on as inconsistent with prior decisional law and no longer to be followed, stating that Hospital Diagnostic “cannot be reconciled with the rulings of the other departments of the Appellate Division and the… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
” Exercising her greater appellate prerogative, Justice Richter did not merely downgrade as dicta (as did Justice Schlesinger) the First Department’s acceptance of jurisdiction in Hospital Diagnostic, but confronted it head-on as inconsistent with prior decisional law and no longer to be followed, stating that Hospital Diagnostic “cannot be reconciled with the rulings of the other departments of the Appellate Division and the… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
” Exercising her greater appellate prerogative, Justice Richter did not merely downgrade as dicta (as did Justice Schlesinger) the First Department’s acceptance of jurisdiction in Hospital Diagnostic, but confronted it head-on as inconsistent with prior decisional law and no longer to be followed, stating that Hospital Diagnostic “cannot be reconciled with the rulings of the other departments of the Appellate Division and the… [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
United States, 294 U.S. 330 (1935); Nortz v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Circuit Court’s en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 3:22 am
Thus, the documents do not support the claim that defendants willfully delayed plaintiffs suit for their own gain (see Fleyshman v Suckle & Schlesinger, PLLC, 91 AD3d 591,593 [2d Dept 2012], iv denied 19 NY3d 801 [2012] [granting dismissal of a Judiciary Law § 487 (2) cause of action because the “allegation that the defendants ‘willfully delayed [her] recovery with a view to their own ends and benefit’ is a bare legal conclusion”]). [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:30 pm
The first is that more banks failed in Georgia than any other state, so the Eleventh’s Circuit’s ruling will be determinative in connection with the largest state grouping of cases. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:30 am
The court held that the need for inter-branch comity justified abstention, just as respect for military justice counseled abstention in Schlesinger v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:35 am
” It is my sense that NFIB v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 3:34 pm
Cohen, 392 U.S. 83, 94-5 (1968); Schlesinger v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:44 pm
” Saxe, 240 F.3d at 204; see also United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 5:10 pm
State. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
District Judge Richard Roberts, who held that he was bound by Schlesinger v. [read post]
