Search for: "State v. Servantes"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2015, 12:20 am
Heinisch v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: The current debates over Roe v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 8:09 am
However, in defending its controversial abortion law, the State of Mississippi has asked the Court to overturn its prior decisions in Roe v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 4:33 pm
Have you taken a civil service exam to become a police officer, fire fighter, corrections officer, sanitation worker or other civil servant for New York City or New York State and received a letter stating you are disqualified for medical reasons? [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:00 am
Apparently, Douglas Miller sued the state Senate for discrimination, harassment and retaliation after he was fired from a job in Berryhill's district office in Modesto in 2013 (Miller v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 9:36 am
Snaras v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
Darius V. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:39 pm
The California Supreme Court, in Martinez v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:01 am
And, based on the CCA opinion in Griffith v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
In short, the basic foundation of the administrative state is a system of agencies, served by civil servants––all governed by administrative law and operating within well-defined statutory constraints, subject to a comprehensive judicial review. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:30 pm
Were the police acting as helpful civil servants in this situation? [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:38 am
Servant in place of the incumbents." [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm
Comments In the Grand Chamber judgment in Guja v. [read post]
26 Mar 2004, 10:24 am
Friday's Boston Globe reports that notices has been sent to town and city clerks in Massachusetts advising them of training sessions for the issuance of same-sex marriage licences in early May, prior to the date of May 17 when the first state-authorized same-sex marriages licenses in the US are set to be issued pursuant to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 12:54 pm
Additional Resources: Miller v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 12:54 pm
Additional Resources: Miller v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 7:07 am
Justice Kelly, joined by Justices McCormack and Bernstein dissented (UAW v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:16 am
Mayo v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:07 pm
The legal balancing exercise that has to be carried out when dealing with situations involving political discussions between politicians, civil servants and private individuals is therefore quite complex: All individuals making statements about political matters are entitled to ‘enhanced’ protection expression; However, elected politicians are expected to have thicker skins and are subject to “wider limits of acceptable criticism” (see, for example, Janowski… [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 4:32 am
Check out the Eleventh Circuit's recent opinion in US v. [read post]
