Search for: "State v. Sewell" Results 61 - 80 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Charles Cohen of the Indiana State Police testified that for efficiency, law enforcement agencies used to be provided the “backdoor” keys to break the encryption as long as they presented a warrant. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
Center 1700Decided: March 23, 2016Like in Sewell and Kuijper, the Board reversed here because the examiner did not identify a sufficient reason for a person of ordinary skill to have modified the base reference in the proposed manner. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:26 am
Center 1700Decided: March 23, 2016Like in Sewell and Kuijper, the Board reversed here because the examiner did not identify a sufficient reason for a person of ordinary skill to have modified the base reference in the proposed manner. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:04 pm by Parker Higgins
At another point in the hearing, lawmakers pressed the FBI's Amy Hess on the role of third-party “grey hat” hackers in accessing the data on the iPhone at the heart of the hotly contested “Apple v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
  In that case, Bean J stated that “I do not accept that in every case evidence will be required to satisfy the serious harm test. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm by Brenda Fulmer
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:26 am by Gregory Dell
A recent court decision may give this argument more strength.Actual Duties Must Be Considered In a recent decision in Richard Sewell v. [read post]