Search for: "State v. Sherry" Results 61 - 80 of 589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2022, 6:13 am by John Jascob
The state has no compelling interest in censoring speech it finds “repugnant,” the court wrote, and the First Amendment does not allow remedying unwanted speech with enforced silence (Honeyfund.com, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
This line at least should give us comfort in a time of theocratic ascendency in the United States.Follow @SherryColb Sherry F. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 7:40 am by John Jascob
By Anne Sherry, J.D.Retaliatory intent is a required element of a whistleblower claim under Sarbanes-Oxley, the Second Circuit held. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 5:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “The amended complaint states a cause of action for legal malpractice and the documents submitted do not utterly refute the factual allegations underlying that cause of action (see generally Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Sadly, we will likely find out soon.Follow @SherryColb Sherry F. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The majority opinion’s rationale in In the Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
There has already been an outpouring of commentary on the leaked opinion in the Supreme Court’s pending Dobbs case, in which Samuel Alito (apparently joined by four of his colleagues) will not only decide that Mississippi’s 15-week cutoff for abortion access is constitutional but that Roe v. [read post]