Search for: "State v. Simon" Results 61 - 80 of 1,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2011, 9:58 am by Barry Barnett
Blawgletter's friend Sam Simon asked us to visit this morning with the Class Action Committee of the New York State Bar's Antitrust Section, and the chair -- whom we also count as a friend -- Hollis Salzman gave her okay. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
This judgment, in many respects, follows the earlier decision of Haines v Sarner [2005] EWHC 90009 (Costs), in which Simon Gibbs acted for the Defendant. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 3:28 pm by Sean Hayes
Similar Posts:Prohibiting Dreadlocks Is Not Racial Discrimination: EEOC New YorkPrivate Settlements of Federal and New York Fair Labor Claims: Cheeks v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:49 am by brown
Simon BrownWall of SeparationIt’s a shame the state that hosted Tennessee v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:55 am by Mali Friedman
By Mali Friedman and Simon Frankel With all eyes on the Affordable Care Act today, the United States Supreme Court also quietly dismissed a case that could have had a profound impact on a wide range of citizens’ rights litigation—First American Financial Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 9:06 am by Sean Hayes
Exceptions to NY “At Will” Employee Law Private Settlements of Federal and New York Fair Labor Claims: Cheeks v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 5:55 am
Beaty and Republic of Iraq v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:20 am by Bridget Crawford
The Supreme Court of the United States will take up this question this term in the context of North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
James:  "The Law Firm commenced the instant action to recover legal fees in the amount of $58,900.36, arising from its representation of Simon during her underlying matrimonial action, entitled Simon v Simon (Sup Ct, NY County, Index No.: 303306/2001). [read post]