Search for: "State v. Singh "
Results 61 - 80
of 619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Applying Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704 ;and Lumba [2011] UKSC 12, detaining B would exceed the implied limits on the exercise of administrative power to detain for immigration purposes. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 4:47 am
Agreeing with Lord Sales, she accepted Singh LJ’s jurisdictional reason. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:46 am
") AC32398 - State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:33 pm
Today, the Supreme Court of Canada heard arguments in the Pardeep Singh Chouhan case about the significance of peremptory challenges in jury selection. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
s other leading “fair comment” case – BCA v Singh ([2010] EWCA Civ 350). [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
He tweets at @VarunKesar999 [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:23 am
Knox v Aronson, Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP ; 2018 NY Slip Op 09030 [168 AD3d 70] ; December 27, 2018 Singh, J. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
Applying Hardial Singh ;and Lumba [2011] UKSC 12, doing so would exceed the implied limits on the exercise of administrative power to detain for immigration purposes. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:24 am
Tejinder Singh previewed the case for the blog. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 10:06 pm
 Khunkhun states that Ms. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
In the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) Nicol J held that a Government Press Release which meant that the claimant, Dr Salman Butt, was an extremist hate speaker constituted a statement of opinion, not of fact. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am
The two key cases are Province of Bombay v Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay [1947] AC 58 and Lord Advocate v Dumbarton District Council [1990] 2 AC 580. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am
s other leading “fair comment” case – BCA v Singh ([2010] EWCA Civ 350). [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
Great coverage of Navtej Singh Jauhar v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 5:27 am
Recent examples of such agreements include: the “consultancy arrangements” between the Middle Eastern ship manufacturer Privinvest and former Credit Suisse bankers Andrew Pearse and Surjan Singh, in regards to the corruption scandal involving Mozambican state owned companies Proindicus, EMATUM and MAM; and the numerous consultancy contracts which the Gupta linked “consultancy” firm Homix entered into. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:20 am
R (on the application of HA (Nigeria)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 979 (Admin) – Read judgment The detention of a mentally ill person in an Immigration Removal Centre (IRC) amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment and false imprisonment, and was irrational, the High Court has ruled. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:14 am
Epiphany Community Nursery Sch. v Levey ; 2019 NY Slip Op 00842 ; Decided on February 5, 2019 ; Appellate Division, First Department ; Singh, J., J. is not primarily about accounting malpractice. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
Georgetown Law observes the centennial of United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
The AG’s hypothetical complaint would have been based on the state DTPA, so a four part test from Singh v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 8:43 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
