Search for: "State v. Smith III" Results 61 - 80 of 960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2012, 2:01 pm by Bob Lawless
Because federal bankruptcy courts are not full-fledged Article III courts, staffed by judges appointed by the president and holding life-tenure, a bankruptcy court could not hear Smith's counterclaim, which was a traditional state-law claim. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 1:45 pm
Judge Milan Smith authors a smart opinion today about when (if ever) you have to remand a putative class action case that was removed under CAFA once you find out that Article III standing is absent over the named plaintiff. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm by Gabriel Chin
Nevertheless, as the briefs in Smith v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
FailingerDenying the Poor Access to Court: United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:31 pm by Dana Muir
After the district court held that Thole and Smith had Article III standing to sue the fiduciaries, U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Smith Issue: Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in concluding that the Michigan Supreme Court failed to apply "clearly established Federal law" under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:13 am by Jon Sands
§ 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). [read post]