Search for: "State v. Southern Electric Generating Company"
Results 61 - 80
of 150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
In the early 1980’s, Georgia Power Company sold, at auction, many of its used electric transformers to the Ward Transformer Company. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd & Anor, heard 3 – 5 March 2014. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:28 am
Supreme Court’s decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:13 am
Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd & Anor, heard 3 – 5 March 2014. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
Among other things, the companies own and operate coal-fired power plants in six states in the USA. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 8:24 am
District Court for the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
FLO Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB Precedential No.9: ELECTRONIC CANDLE COMPANY generics for light bulbs: In re Wm. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
FLO Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB Precedential No.9: ELECTRONIC CANDLE COMPANY generics for light bulbs: In re Wm. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm
(now part of Duke Energy), Southern Company, and Xcel Energy Inc. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
In that case, the governmental and environmental plaintiffs (plaintiffs include the States of Connecticut, New York, California, Iowa, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin, the City of New York, The Open Space Institute, The Open Space Conservancy, and the Audubon Society of New Hampshire) had claimed, in two consolidated actions brought originally in the Southern District of New York that defendants’ (American Electric Power Company, American… [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:07 pm
”[8] Harry Markopolos, the fraud investigator that uncovered Madoff’s shenanigans, failed in claiming that the General Electric Company manifested a decades long fraud after disclosing that he stood to gain on the decline of certain GE securities based on the publication of his own research.[9] A short-seller’s singular incentive is to attain above market returns by issuing biased research that triggers a decline in stock price of the covered… [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP) United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:57 am
Morningware, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 9:44 am
PwC v SAAD Investments Company Ltd (In Liquidation), heard 29-30 April. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 7:18 am
Those interested in the issue should read a recent federal opinion called Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
American Technical Ceramics Corp (The 271 Patent Blog) ITC decides not to review initial determination terminating investigation relating to certain light emitting diode chips brought in response to a complaint by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild (337-TA-674) (ITC Law Blog) (ITC Law Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Analog - Analog Devices files new 337 complaint regarding certain service Mount MEMS microphones (ITC Law Blog) Global Findability - Patents and the movie industry:… [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
The Murray Energy Debtors together comprise the largest privately-owned coal company in the United States, producing in 2018 alone approximately 53 million tons of thermal coal used by the electric utility industry. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
Lastly, Norges Bank has announced its decisions to revoke the exclusions of Empire District Electric Company and Anglo American PLC; and to end the observation of EDP - Energias de Portugal S.A, Endesa S.A., Portland General Electric Co (PGE), and Enel SpA. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
The rule states that if there’s a broad and general grant of rights, an ambiguous grant will be interpreted to apply to technologies that were known at the time of the grant. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
The rule states that if there’s a broad and general grant of rights, an ambiguous grant will be interpreted to apply to technologies that were known at the time of the grant. [read post]
