Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,218
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 9:33 pm
28; R. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Board of Education, the court famously overruled the doctrine of “separate but equal” that it had articulated in Plessy v. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 1:01 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 12:36 pm
Declaring the NLRB’s rationale to be “nonsense,” on March 26, 2024, a unanimous three-judge panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in Stern Produce Company Inc v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 11:30 am
Its board consists of two state officials and five members appointed by the Governor and approved by the Senate. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
Additional Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:10 am
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Equality Florida v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Denial of effective access to all meets the formal criterion of “equal treatment”! [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From Koe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 8:55 pm
Maltz (Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers Law School) has posted Failed Quest: The Unsuccessful Effort to Reconcile Brown With Originalist Theory (American Journal of Law and Equality, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:46 pm
Summers v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
Section 5 applies equally to Sections 1 and 3. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 7:00 am
On February 6, 2024, in Philpot v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:48 am
Susan V. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From Friday's California Court of Appeal decision in Norway v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 1:11 pm
Bonds in Bonds v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
In Kim v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
” The petition contended that the listing rule violated the Equal Protection clause and, by compelling controversial disclosure, the First Amendment, citing the conflict minerals decision, Nat’l Ass’n of Mfrs. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The court invoked language from the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The last part provides detailed studies of the Court’s jurisprudence in four substantive areas: social and economic legislation, the legal challenges that Prohibition caused, the jurisprudence of federalism, and the law involving labor, race relations, and equal protection. [read post]
