Search for: "State v. TM"
Results 61 - 80
of 740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2006, 10:38 am
United States Postal Service, No. 05-13492 (11th Cir. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:03 am
” Of course, this foreign anaphora omits a key domestic conclusion: the harm was directed to the USA and felt in the USA by the TM owner. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:53 am
Fioranelli v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:40 am
P’ship v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:09 am
Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:59 am
A case arising from the First Circuit, Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Victoria’s Secret v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 2:19 am
Glasscraft Door I, L.P. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
The law has been recently considered by the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Limited [2015] UKSC 10; [2015] AC 1229, which I sought to summarise in Vertical Leisure Limited v Poleplus Limited [2015] EWHC 841 (IPEC). [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 1:56 am
That latter section does not expressly state that the opposition period cannot be extended after the fact. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:55 am
So there is no infringement of a registered TM, but could there be passing off? [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
McKenna: we can’t really mean that a state of uncertainty is actionable—if we did, “I don’t know whether X makes this” would be actionable/part of the “confused” group. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:35 am
Cummings v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
Case by case v. systematic: the cost of false positives and false negatives; court doesn’t consider the long-run consequences, like Boston Hockey or post-sale confusion. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 5:01 am
Crisler (2018), and TM v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:07 am
Zero Motorcycles, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:14 am
C=HOLDINGS B.V. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Titanic v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:51 pm
Hard to get too far based just on equity.Hunter: not equity; why we’re ok w/merchandising right, which seems contrary to stated aims of TM law. [read post]
