Search for: "State v. Tallie"
Results 61 - 80
of 387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2013, 9:30 am
Abbott Griffith v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
The United States Supreme Court removed the death penalty from Maryland's slate of punishments in 1972 in the wake of Furman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
Finally, the pivot from tallying states to enshrining the APA’s view as the law of the land solves very little. [read post]
29 May 2025, 12:27 pm
They also invoked candidate-specific injuries, including campaign resource burdens and the alleged dilution of the “accurate vote tally. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:37 pm
In a 10-page filing in Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:43 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court decided Hall v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 6:18 am
The recent case of McMaster v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:05 am
Additional Resources: Panzera v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 6:53 am
Interesting matchup here, with two contenders that had a big year facing off against state and local governments. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:20 am
In a majority opinion in Evenwel v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 10:00 am
The Supreme Court in Franklin v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:15 am
Although the vast majority of states require some form of notification of security breaches, formal notification requirements are rare outside the United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:29 pm
Please see Hart Ventures, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 11:04 am
When the initial vote tally was made in the juvenile judgeship race, Williams was ahead of his opponent, Tracie M. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm
The court says Coursera’s process provided reasonable notice to the plaintiff: the language in the email is reasonably conspicuous because the header clearly states that the email included updates to the TOU, the TOU hyperlink is in blue font and stands out from the remaining text, and the hyperlink is followed by a description of the TOU which specifically calls out “[u]pdated arbitration language. [read post]
