Search for: "State v. Taylor"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2024, 3:31 am
While the ICWA has survived these legal challenges, including the recent 2023 Haaland v. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 10:11 am
It may not be accidental, then, that Judge Taylor spent more time on the state secrets issue than she did on the merits. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
And then there is the case of State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:45 am
Taylor.. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:47 pm
Yesterday, the Hawaii Supreme Court granted cert in a tax case styled CompUSA Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 11:00 am
“We agree with the Eighth Circuit’s resolution of this issue in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:20 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:05 am
Cheshire V-at the Duke professors, journalists, and others who had so eagerly joined Nifong's mob. [read post]
20 May 2008, 8:45 am
Taylor. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Our Asheville workers compensation attorneys are encouraged by the ruling of Taylor v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
The United States Supreme Court in Godinez v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:13 am
Jurisdiction to resolve an impasse in collective bargaining under the Taylor LawPolice Benevolent Association v City of New York, 285 A.D.2d 52 In a unanimous ruling, the Appellate Division, Third Department, held that the New York State Public Employment Relations Board [PERB] has exclusive jurisdiction insofar as resolving Taylor Law impasse situations are concerned. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 10:00 am
See Panico v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
Taylor Law considerations concerning General Municipal Law Section 207-a/207-cBarnes v Council 82, [David Monroe], Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 719Watertown v Watertown PBA, Court of Appeals, 95 NY2d 73Local 2562, IAFF, AFL-CIO, v Cohoes, Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 686The Court of Appeals has handed down three rulings concerning issues involving collective bargaining under the Taylor Law as they relate to negotiating procedures to implement and administer… [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
In Nakkhumpun v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:03 am
Following a decision in 2005 by the Court of Justice of the European Communities (Finanzamt Gladback v Linneweber (Case C-453/02), [2005] ECR I-1131, [2008] STC 1069) which stated that VAT was not, and never had been, payable on income attributable to gaming machines, Carlton submitted several claims relating to overpayments of VAT to HMRC. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:03 am
Taylor, September 27, 2021, per curiam). [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 2:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
State Supreme Court Justice Samuel J. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:18 pm
E.g., United States v. [read post]
