Search for: "State v. Tuttle" Results 61 - 80 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2015, 4:45 am by Amy Howe
” At the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Peter Smith and Robert Tuttle analyze last week’s decision in Walker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
The justices held 5-4 in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm by Marty Lederman
Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. (1968), and United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle discuss Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:09 am by James Romoser
” The University of Pennsylvania Law School’s Regulatory Review launches a series of essays on the court’s 2019-20 term, including a piece by Jon Devine and David Henkin on County of Maui v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Judge Brinkema rightly rejected this argument, citing the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in McCreary County v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care, Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle maintain that, “[d]espite legitimate controversy over the application of the ministerial exception, Morrissey-Berru is a reassuring nod toward the continuity of a principle long rooted in the American tradition of church-state separation. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Where the court made no such finding here, and instead, improperly delegated the parenting time determination to the father, the error required reversalIn Matter of C.M. v. [read post]