Search for: "State v. Underwood"
Results 61 - 80
of 200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2020, 2:03 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Monday in Trump v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 10:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 6:05 am
Underwood, 717 F.2d 482, 483-86 (9th Cir. 1983) (en banc ); United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 2:40 pm
Barbara Underwood, Solicitor General of New York, argued the anti-preemption position, joined by all 49 other states as amici. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 12:57 pm
Federal Trade Commission and People of the State of New York, by James, v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
Since then she’s been refused certain spousal benefits and is required to pay inheritance taxes on Underwood’s estate; issues which, ironically, are nearly identical to those raised by Edith Winsor in the seminal same-sex marriage case, United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:47 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 9:23 am
Underwood v. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 9:23 am
Underwood v. [read post]
New Jersey Appellate Court Upholds Immunity for Health Care Entity Responding to a Reference Request
12 Dec 2011, 10:35 am
In Senisch v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 1:44 pm
In Thorn v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:50 am
" District Judge Underwood dissents. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:41 pm
Kaylor, 877 F.2d 658, 663 (8th Cir. 1989); Underwood, 717 F.2d at 483-84 (9th Cir. 1983); United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 9:30 pm
Underwood Chair in Free Enterprise at Vanderbilt Law School . . . debate the merits of originalism in constitutional interpretation. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm
Underwood (1985). [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Underwood, New York Solicitor General, will argue for New York. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:08 am
Applying the Supreme Court's 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:31 am
Oral argument was held yesterday before the Court of Appeals in Hurrell-Harring v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
” V Record 4241. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
