Search for: "State v. V. B."
Results 61 - 80
of 41,565
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2024, 11:04 am
From Thursday's Finchem v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:25 am
State Farm Mutual Auto. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 7:57 am
* When Lawyer A opens the file using the link, he or she discovers the link provides access to B's client's documents which were not expected to be disclosed and are likely to be considered confidential.This is what happened in a recent case in New York called Pursuit Credit Special Opportunity Fund, L.P. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Circuit”) partially overturned a decision issued by the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) in Absolute Healthcare d/b/a Curaleaf Arizona v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:19 am
Bacardi & Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Arnold LJ dissented, considering that the relevant event/state of affairs cannot be overcome by an offer of non-contractual performance. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm
[…] Given this, and considering that the appealed decision overturned the exequatur decree of the judgment in question on the ground that the [Canadian] judgment, which recognized a judgment from the United States, was a “summary judgment” (hukm musta’jil) enforceable only in the rendering State, despite the broad wording of [the applicable provisions],[vii] which covers all judgments (kul al-ahkam) rendered in a foreign State without specifying… [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:05 pm
What confounds me, however, is Part III-B of Justice Barrett's Vidal concurrence. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 1:02 pm
ROBERT B. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:13 am
Alejandro Mayorkas, et al., No. 18-cv-01587-JD, and Pars Equality Center, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm
”) In Virginia State Pharmacy Bd. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 10:53 am
The case known as Garland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 9:54 am
If Justice Alito does not voluntarily step aside as basic common sense and fairness demand, Chief Justice John Roberts should invoke Canon 2 (A) & (B) of the Supreme Court’s Code of Conduct, adopted on November 13, 2023, to remove him from any decision-making role in the cases. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 9:07 am
In Eastern Platinum Limited v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 7:40 am
Campos-Chavez v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:40 pm
Citing to a 2004 Supreme Court case, Verizon Commc’ns., Inc. v. [read post]
