Search for: "State v. Velasquez" Results 61 - 80 of 85
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2009, 10:13 am
I can't say it any better than Judge Reinhardt, who authors the opinion:"As an "attempt" in the state of California requires only "slight acts in furtherance of the [criminal] design," People v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:27 am
Summary of Decision issued June 18, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Velasquez v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
  Here, in Terio v Spodek ;  2009 NY Slip Op 04412 Decided on June 2, 2009 ; Appellate Division, Second Department  we see how that might happen:   "To recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must prove, inter alia, the existence of an attorney-client relationship (see Velasquez v Katz, 42 AD3d 566, 567; Moran v Hurst, 32 AD3d 909; Wei Cheng Chang v Pi, 288 AD2d 378, 380; Volpe v Canfield,… [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:19 pm
The California Court of Appeal agreed with my opinion of class-action lawsuits in the recent decision, Starbucks v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 6:00 am
Velasquez, Supervising Judge of the Orange County Superior Court Complex Civil Panel, issued an interesting order in a wage and hour case, Ybarra v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Moore, No. 06-1082 In a case raising the issue of whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest based on probable cause but prohibited by state law, the Supreme Court rules that warrantless arrests for crimes committed in the presence of an arresting officer are reasonable under the Constitution, and that while states are free to regulate such arrests however they desire, state restrictions do not alter the Fourth Amendment's protections. … [read post]