Search for: "State v. Whitaker" Results 61 - 80 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Whitaker, interstate sales by gun dealers] “Bump Stock Rule Bumps Up Against the Constitution” [Shapiro and Larosiere] “The Most Common Firearm in America is Not a ‘Weapon of War’” [same on Cato amicus brief in Worman v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
On this week’s National Security Law Podcast, Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck closed out 2018 with a deep dive into the state secrets privilege: Zach ZhenHe Tan surveyed the impact of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jesner v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:50 am by Rachel Brown
Zach ZhenHe Tan assessed the impact of Jesner v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
” The bill follows the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also issued one opinion yesterday: In United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 8:00 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Elena Chacko analyzed on the Israeli Supreme Court’s recent decision in Tabish v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 11:41 am by Victoria Clark
Across court documents, the Justice Department cites United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm by John Floyd
Chuck Grassley, Whitaker ran for the state treasurer’s position in Iowa but lost the race to the incumbent Democrat. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie looks at the legal challenges to the appointment of Matthew Whitaker as deputy attorney general, including one that “comes in the guise of Michaels v Sessions, a case challenging the federal ban on guns for convicted felons that has seen its caption change to Michaels v Whitaker” during the cert petition stage. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 10:29 am by David Kris
One case frequently cited against the legitimacy of Whitaker’s appointment is NLRB v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:07 pm by Tim Zubizarreta
Engel also cites the Supreme Court’s 1898 decision in United States v. [read post]