Search for: "State v. William Z." Results 61 - 80 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
By Sophia Williams From 1933 to 1945, during the Nazi party’s rise to power, the Nazis looted, confiscated, or involuntarily transferred more than half a million artworks owned by Jewish art collectors and other victims.[1] Following Nazi party looting before and after World War II, thousands of artworks ended up in museum collections around the world, including in New York, and remain there today.[2] A recent act passed in August 2022 “to amend the education law, in relation to… [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 12:42 pm by Tia Sewell
Plaintiff’s lawyers will ask presiding Judge John Z. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Peck Williams Trade Supplies Ltd & Ors [2020] EWHC 966 (QB) dealing with preliminary issues as to meaning and fact/opinion. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:59 am by INFORRM
” In Z v Finland [1997]the same Court found Finland in breach of Article 8 of the Convention by disclosing the name of Z’s name and medical information (in a relation to a case whereby one of the issues related to when Z’s husband’s contracted HIV). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:29 pm
(3/6/07)Epstein on FDA drug preemption (3/4/07)Implied warranty - Pennsylvania has a better idea (3/1/07)Williams v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal had struck out parts of the claim in December on the grounds of the former King’s state immunity. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
  On the same day, there were hearings on applications for injunctions in the cases of Payone v Logo and Searl v Dimova-Handley. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 7:23 pm
” (WV&Z’s emphasis) If, however, Belgium is confirmed to be an available forum, the lead plaintiffs state they will consent to entry of the order. [read post]