Search for: "State v. Yong" Results 61 - 80 of 91
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am by J
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am by J
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am by J
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am by J
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
The Supreme Court's judgment last month in Yograj Infrastructure v Ssang Yong Engineering has added to the difficulty.Before attempting an account of the effect of this decision on the law, it may be helpful to briefly recapitulate. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:25 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In our last post under the label “Arbitration: Choice of Law”, we did a descriptive comment on the decision of the Supreme Court in Yograj Infrastructure v Ssang Yong Engineering & Construction Co. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am by Roshonda Scipio
Johnsen, editor.New York : Nova Science Publishers, c2011.KF6668.P22 2007 U2 2011International TradeLaw and development perspective on international trade law / edited by Yong-Shik Lee ... [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:03 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In this post, we discuss the judgement in detail.Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Altamas Kabir & Cyraic Joseph, JJCase: Civil Appeal No. 7652/ 2011 (arising out of SLP (C) No. 25624/ 2010)Date: 01 September 2011Facts:12.04.06 National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) awarded a contract to Ssang Yong Engineering & Construction Co. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
Adamas Limited v Mrs Yong Ting Ping How Fok Cheung, heard 28 June 2011. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
Adamas Limited v Mrs Yong Ting Ping How Fok Cheung, heard 28 June 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
Adamas Limited v Mrs Yong Ting Ping How Fok Cheung, heard 28 June 2011. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
Adamas Limited v Mrs Yong Ting Ping How Fok Cheung, heard on 28 June 2011. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Blog Editorial
First, Adamas Limited v Mrs Yong Ting Ping How Fok Cheung will be heard on Tuesday 28 June 2011 by Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Clarke. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:04 am
As detailed here, the journal welcomes, promotes, and disseminates high-quality, original research and analysis in the form of articles, commentaries, case summaries, and other analysis relevant to its mandate.My article is entitled "Yong Vui Kong v. [read post]