Search for: "Stone v. C " Results 61 - 80 of 819
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2010, 1:55 pm
Prof Annand helpfully explains the reasoning of the Court of Justice in Case C-398/08 Vorspring durch Technik and the "Catch 22" created by the "misunderstanding and over-enthusistic application of OHIM v Mobelwerk". [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:19 am by PaulKostro
EDS, 132 N.J. 330, 334 (1993); Prof’l Stone, Stucco & Siding Applicators, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:37 am by Danielle Citron
Charlie Kennedy and Berin Szoka of TechFreedom have an insightful op-ed in c/net yesterday. [read post]
11 May 2022, 2:32 pm by Giorgio Luceri
Specifically, the case involved the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art Foundation (Mass MoCA) Foundation in North Adams and Christoph Büchelis, a Swiss installation artist.Kluwer Copyright Blog has posted about the outcome of the Court of Justice of the European Union's decision in Case C-401/19 - Poland v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In its decision the Appellate Division, citing Stone v Bloomberg L.P., 163 AD3d 1028, quoting Greenberg v Spitzer, 155 AD3d 27: "The elements of a cause of action for defamation are (a) a false statement that tends to expose a person to public contempt, hatred, ridicule, aversion, or disgrace, (b) published without privilege or authorization to a third party, (c) amounting to fault as judged by, at a minimum, a negligence standard, and (d) either causing… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In its decision the Appellate Division, citing Stone v Bloomberg L.P., 163 AD3d 1028, quoting Greenberg v Spitzer, 155 AD3d 27: "The elements of a cause of action for defamation are (a) a false statement that tends to expose a person to public contempt, hatred, ridicule, aversion, or disgrace, (b) published without privilege or authorization to a third party, (c) amounting to fault as judged by, at a minimum, a negligence standard, and (d) either causing… [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 11:40 pm
Beer Pong shots c/o WikipediaA recent High Court decision (Breakthrough Funding v Nearby Media [2017] EWHC 2271 ch) follows on from an interim injunction which was granted by Arnold J earlier in the year. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
(c) There was no reference in invoices or advertising and promotional materials showing that the two undertakings came from the same family. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by INFORRM
While Justice Thomas has cast some doubt on this form of analysis in his opinion in Reed v. [read post]