Search for: "Stone v. Vitale"
Results 61 - 80
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2010, 1:16 pm
In April 2007, the Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 5:30 am
The case, Dillon v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
(IP Dragon) Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango) Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46) Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46) Disruptive innovations:… [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 6:20 am
An initial agency interpretation is not instantly carved in stone. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:41 am
Stones Left Unturned—What is “Electronic Communication”? [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Still, the two constructs were the tools they had to get themselves there, and they had to be used in certain ways or else appear to pass–in Mark’s words–”from lawyerly deliberation to sheer willfulness” (to quote Mark’s rendering of Harlan Fiske Stone’s verdict on Colgate v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:44 am
In Gur Narain Das & Anr. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:08 am
(The case is cited as Eight Mile Style, LLC and Martin Affiliated, LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm
On exam, PA Boyer found Lawrence afebrile with unremarkable vital signs. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm
All of the proxies started dancing (you can find most of them on the venerable Google Shill List from the Oracle v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 8:24 am
” People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
To be sure, he received his share of criticism from those who believed that his principals tended to be those of the Democratic or British Labour parties, but few attacked his most basic premise that taking rights seriously was the foundation stone of any regime worth honoring with the name “constitutional. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Afro-IP)Australia Professor Fitzgerald’s opinion article ‘It’s vital to sort out ownership of ideas’: (IP:KCE)BrazilBrazil wrestles with decision on GM corn, seed patenting: (Intellectual Property Watch),PTO recognized as international patent search authority: (International Law Office)CanadaTrade mark statistics - CIPO 2006-2007 Annual Report: (Canadian Trademark Blog)IP injunctions in Canada: (ipblog.ca),Professor Ariel Katz’ research… [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:04 pm
” [Prosecutor v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:20 pm
” [Prosecutor v. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 11:20 am
” United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:04 pm
” [Prosecutor v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 357920 Seattle, WA 98195-7920 Phone: (206) 685-4181; (800) 214-8731 (I&R/Toll Free) TTY: (206) 616-1396 E-mail: uwat@u.washington.edu Web: http://wata.org Washington Loan Program Washington Assistive Technology Foundation 3670 Stone Way North Seattle, WA 89103 Phone: (206) 826-1038 TTY: (800) 214-8731 (Toll Free) Fax: (206) 826-1138 E-mail: fpennell@watf.org Telecommunications Access Service P.O. [read post]
