Search for: "Strawn v. Strawn"
Results 61 - 80
of 155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2012, 10:46 am
Strawn (see my blog post about Strawn) and Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:26 am
In Strawn v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:45 am
” The complaint in B.L.R. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
If so, then I say “good catch, Winston & Strawn! [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
If so, then I say “good catch, Winston & Strawn! [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
If so, then I say “good catch, Winston & Strawn! [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 3:51 am
This is the central lesson of Rudolph v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:11 pm
Schaerr of Winston & Strawn; and Mr. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:00 pm
Williams v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:45 pm
The reasoning: Where a sophisticated client imposes a strategic decision on counsel, the client’s action absolves the attorney from liability for malpractice (Town of North Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746 [2006]; Stolmeier v Fields, 280 AD2d 342 [2001]). [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
O’Neal v Muchnick Golieb & Golieb, P.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 2:07 pm
Supreme Court justices on both sides in the landmark D.C. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:22 pm
In Greenwood v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:36 pm
Schaerr of Winston & Strawn LLP, Prof. [read post]
9 May 2012, 7:54 am
Kaiser, Adam Kaiser, Albany, Art Hazlitt, Arthur Hazlitt, Arthur V. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:26 pm
In Strawn v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Supreme Court ruling in "Quon" highlights importance of employer technology-usage and privacy policiesPrepared by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLPOn June 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided City of Ontario v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am
On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, but for defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff’s principal that it could be locked into the sale agreement in perpetuity if it did not obtain municipal approval for redevelopment, it would not have entered into the contract as written and would have avoided litigation with the buyer who sued for specific performance (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 151 AD3d 413 [1st Dept… [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:30 am
Strawn In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:05 am
Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746, 749; Mecca v Shang, 258 AD2d 569), and likewise subject to the three-year limitations period (see Harris v Kahn, Hoffman, Nonenmacher & Hochman, LLP, 59 AD3d 390; Melendez v Bernstein, 29 AD3d 872). [read post]
