Search for: "Strickland v. Strickland"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2022, 7:19 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 7:04 am
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm
Next up is Bartenwerfer v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:42 pm
” Strickland v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 11:46 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:23 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am
., Learning, Memory & Cognition, 378 (2011). [4] Strickland v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 7:19 am
Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit violated basic principles of Strickland v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 1:28 pm
Washington v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
Texas, a capital defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
When can alimony be changed because of cohabitation in Tennessee? [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 4:08 am
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:07 pm
Cronic — in which the Supreme Court suggested that, though Strickland v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:46 pm
The COA reversed the district court, holding, under the Strickland v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
See Coleman v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:53 am
(Judge Bress surely knows the difference between the "no deficient performance" and "no prejudice" prongs of Strickland; indeed, later in the opinion, on a different point about mitigating evidence, he expressly relies upon a "no prejudice" holding with respect to that -- separate -- issue.)So that part of the opinion seems just wrong.Judge Bress then follows this conclusion with what purports to be a separate point -- an effort to argue that, yeah,… [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 3:44 pm
The 1984 landmark Supreme Court case of Strickland v. [read post]
