Search for: "Stringer v. Stringer"
Results 61 - 80
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2022, 2:45 pm
Enlarge (credit: Charles McQuillan / Stringer | Getty Images News) For the first time since Roe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 12:52 pm
Clark County Sch Bd of Trustees 47 IDELR 151, 479 F.3d 1175 (9th Cir. 3/21/7); Stringer v. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 8:15 am
Clark County Sch Bd of Trustees 47 IDELR 151, 479 F.3d 1175 (9th Cir. 3/21/7); Stringer v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:00 pm
In a recent case, Peel Law Association v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 11:11 am
August 14, 2012) If the name Stringer Bell means anything to you, you probably know what a “burner” is. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Gideon v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 8:23 am
This Federal Circuit case highlights the elements that must be met by an injunctive relief request in a patent infringement case, as recently defined by eBay Inc v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 7:52 am
Clark County Sch Bd of Trustees 47 IDELR 151, 479 F.3d 1175 (9th Cir. 3/21/7); Stringer v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:50 am
In 2009, the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) in the cases of Stringer and Others v HM Revenue & Customs and Pereda v Madrid Movilidad established the following principles: Workers who are off work on sick leave continue to accrue annual leave Workers can take holiday during sick leave, however if they are unable or do not wish to do so, they can take it at a different time, even if this means carrying it over to the next holiday year These decisions were… [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:09 am
’ “ Stringer v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:47 pm
Paul V. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm
However, Mr Stringer’s counter claim for defamation is going ahead. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm
On 1 March 2016, Sharp and Hamblen LJJ heard a renewed application for permission to appeal in the case of Sloutsker v Romanova. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:54 pm
CONSTRUCTION, INJURY AND TORT LAW, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW Stringer v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:51 pm
New Zealand Stringer v Craig [2020] NZHC 644, a libel claim brought by a former Conservative Party member against the former leader of the party and a number of those involved in the publication of a booklet accusing him of being engaged in dirty politics. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
New Zealand Craig v Stringer [2020] NZCA 260 the question of whether asking for a witness to return for the fourth successive time to give evidence in a defamation trial constituted an abuse of process. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
See, e.g., Campo v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 4:23 am
This appears to conflict with the reasoning in the earlier case of Stringer v HMRC where the Court indicated that a worker was able to request holiday whilst on sick leave. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 1:33 pm
” Well, that is a clear violation of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Stringer v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 4:53 pm
Yet in the case of United States v. [read post]
