Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan" Results 61 - 80 of 4,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
2023 delivered a banner year for investor recoveries, as the $7.9 billion[1] in settlement funds across the globe was the highest total in the last five years. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 7:23 pm
An alternative analysis, where the missing conjunction is modeled as a covert proform, is proposed, and consequences of the analysis are considered – in particular, I present a novel argument that the US Supreme Court’s controversial decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:57 pm by Christine Corcos
An alternative analysis, where the missing conjunction is modeled as a covert proform, is proposed, and consequences of the analysis are considered – in particular, I present a novel argument that the US Supreme Court’s controversial decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
  At the close of 2023, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom handed down its eagerly awaited and widely publicized judgment in Thaler v Comptroller-General confirming that a patent application may not name an AI machine as an inventor. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Gianna Hill
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the plaintiff got a lot less money at the second trial.The case is Cole v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:49 am
In another notable victory for the Plaintiff's bar at the Pennsylvania Supreme Court level, that Court, in the case of Sullivan v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 6:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Defendants take up an appeal, but they cannot prosecute the appeal because of a procedural error.The case is Maye v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Sullivan, Cabranes and Nathan) holds that plaintiff cannot show that the white officers had intentionally acted to prevent him from joining the task force and that plaintiff does not assert there was any racially-motivated stereotyping.The case is Hanks v. [read post]