Search for: "Summers v. State Of Texas et al" Results 61 - 80 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2012, 12:38 pm by Brian Wolfman
EPA, No. 09-1322 et al., consolidated challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency’s greenhouse gas (GHG) regulations. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Sino-Japanese IPR Memorandum of Understanding (IP Dragon) (China Hearsay) (Managing Intellectual Property) Canada Supreme Court rejects Scotch Whisky Association’s appeal of decision allowing Glenora Distillers to use the word GLEN in its trade mark for Canadian whisky (Excess Copyright) (Canadian Trademark Blog) (ipblog.ca) Global Global -… [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:58 am by WIMS
Michigan News <> Attorney General v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:45 am by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
  [1] Mayo Collaborative Services, DBA Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm by fjhinojosa
Beyer et al., The Fine Art of Intimidating Disgruntled Beneficiaries with In Terrorem Clauses, 51 SMU L. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Stremicks Heritage Foods LLC (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Delay seeking transfer of venue trumps other convenience factors: eTool Development, Inc. et al v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] &nbsp; Highlights this week included: Sino-Japanese IPR Memorandum of Understanding (IP Dragon) (China Hearsay) (Managing Intellectual Property) Canada Supreme Court rejects Scotch Whisky Association&rsquo;s appeal of decision allowing Glenora Distillers to use the word GLEN in its trade mark for Canadian whisky (Excess Copyright) (Canadian Trademark Blog) (ipblog.ca)… [read post]
26 May 2012, 4:21 pm
As such, its structures were forever locked into an indissoluble union, it claimed, that no mere State courts or State laws could affect in any way, shape or form, once it had come into being. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm by Jeffrey Mitchell
Federal Courts: Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step)… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step)… [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
, (Ars Technica), (Patent Prospector), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (IP Law Observer), (PLI), (PLI), (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Peter Zura&rsquo;s 271 Patent Blog), (The Invent Blog), (IP Spotlight), (Just a Patent Examiner), (Techdirt), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patently-O), (IAM), (IP ThinkTank), (Against Monopoly), (Against Monopoly), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Ladas &amp; Parry), Global Global - General Virtual monopoly &ndash; four strategic… [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]