Search for: "Summers v. State Of Texas et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Respondents failed to provide EPA with the required notice, although the State of Rhode Island was notified. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:24 am
The State of Texas v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Country Life, LLC et. al.; McNamara v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Alcatel-Lucent, sustained District Court judgement of validity and infringement by Microsoft of Alcatel-Lucent’s patent, Summer 2009 GlaxoSmithKline v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that resulted in the OEM dropping the lawsuit it filed last summer against the EPA has been positively received this week by at least two top competitors. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:12 am
Circuit Court to put into effect immediately its ruling in that case — SpeechNow.org, et al., v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Stremicks Heritage Foods LLC (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Delay seeking transfer of venue trumps other convenience factors: eTool Development, Inc. et al v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio ‘pay to play’ law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright – Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Arkanoc Solutions, Inc… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Arkanoc Solutions, Inc… [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
Docket: 08-1291 Title: Tucker, et al. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 8:59 am
Scott and White Memorial Hospital, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Sino-Japanese IPR Memorandum of Understanding (IP Dragon) (China Hearsay) (Managing Intellectual Property) Canada Supreme Court rejects Scotch Whisky Association’s appeal of decision allowing Glenora Distillers to use the word GLEN in its trade mark for Canadian whisky (Excess Copyright) (Canadian Trademark Blog) (ipblog.ca) Global Global -… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Sino-Japanese IPR Memorandum of Understanding (IP Dragon) (China Hearsay) (Managing Intellectual Property) Canada Supreme Court rejects Scotch Whisky Association’s appeal of decision allowing Glenora Distillers to use the word GLEN in its trade mark for Canadian whisky (Excess Copyright) (Canadian Trademark Blog) (ipblog.ca)… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step)… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step)… [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:45 pm
The lead case before the Circuit Court was National Rifle Association, et al., v. [read post]
