Search for: "Superior Communications, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 1,551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2006, 8:24 am
The complaint, filed with the Los Angeles Superior Court on August 25, 2006, alleges improprieties in the video game maker's issuance of stock options. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:51 am
In a case that sent shudders through the California employer community, the ABC test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:12 pm
In April 2016, we reported that an Ontario court had upheld a police production order requiring Vice Media Canada Inc. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 10:39 am
Children of America, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:36 pm
Children of America, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 10:00 am
Greyhound, Inc. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
Despite their efforts, on October 26, 2018, Harriman communicated to the Corporations that he was accepting a sales representative position with Cyclone Lighting (“Cyclone”), a competitor of the Corporations. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 4:19 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, et al., No. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:51 am
Updates & background from EMR on the 1,437, 55-gallon barrels dumped into Lake Superior by the US Army between 1959 and 1962Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 6:34 pm
The Insurance Corporation of New York discovered this holding the hard way when the California Court of Appeal published Superior Dispatch, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 4:59 pm
Superior Court (Hohnbaum) (and also Brinkley v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm
Y–3 Holdings, Inc., 87 Cal.App. 4th 1153 (California Court of Appeals 2001). [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Code, § 17200 et seq., § 17203; Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
Weis Markets, Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:18 pm
Most courts limit the application to instances where the accountant was necessary to facilitate the communication.There is a four-part test: 1) to whom was the advice provided - client or lawyer; 2) where client's in-house lawyer is involved, whether counsel also acts as a corporate officer; 3) whether the accountant is regularly employed by the client; 4) which party initiated or received the communications.Where the client is a corporation, there is a five-part test: 1) whether the… [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 4:45 am
Per Bannum, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:03 am
Salton Maxim Housewares, Inc., 94 F. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 11:19 am
The trial court found that the proposed class was not ascertainable, lacked a well-defined community of interest and class treatment was not the superior means to resolve the litigation. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 11:27 am
In Verizon Communications Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:59 am
In Celanese Canada Inc. v. [read post]
