Search for: "Supreme Court of New Mexico" Results 61 - 80 of 3,981
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Katherine Yon Ebright
Former President Donald Trump has promised voters that, if re-elected, he would “immediately” invoke the Alien Enemies Act to effect mass deportations of non-citizens from Mexico. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm by David Super
  It also would cap the Supreme Court at nine justices even though such a proposal fell squarely outside the convention’s mandate. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court and still playing catch-up against Republicans in the federal judiciary, Democrats are hoping to gain a political advantage on a less visible but still important playing field: the state courts. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
After Texas officials refused a federal request to remove the barriers and a lower federal court enjoined federal officials from removing the razor wire, the Supreme Court dissolved the injunction, without explanation. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Vinay Harpalani (University of New Mexico - School of Law) has posted Roberts Rules of (Dis)Order: Doctrinal Doublespeak on Affirmative Action and Stare Decisis (SMU Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Supreme Court has never ruled on the constitutionality of lethal gas, in 1996 a federal appeals court unanimously held that California’s statute authorizing lethal gas violated the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
READ MORE  Nebraska Supreme Court Reviews $44K Fee for Public Records A reporter requested a keyword search of emails as part of an investigation into nitrates in the state’s drinking water from the Nebraska Department of Environment and Energy. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
READ MORE  Nebraska Supreme Court Reviews $44K Fee for Public Records A reporter requested a keyword search of emails as part of an investigation into nitrates in the state’s drinking water from the Nebraska Department of Environment and Energy. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am by Allan Blutstein
Those councils have been in the news a lot with the Supreme Court considering Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Special Counsel Asks Supreme Court to Let Trump’s D.C. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
  First, it’s likely that many or all of the Justices will want to preserve states’ authority to prevent rebels and insurrectionists from holding state offices, as New Mexico did in the Couy Griffin case currently pending before the Court. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Competitive Bay Area Races Are Testing Boundaries” by Bob Egelko (San Francisco Chronicle) for MSN Ethics Delaware: “Supreme Court Rules in Former State Auditor Kathy McGuiness’ Criminal Conviction Appeal” by Xerxes Wilson (Delaware News Journal) for Yahoo News Indiana: “Indiana AG’s Site to Report School Content Ignites Fear for Teachers” by Praveena Somasundaram and Dan Rosenzweig-Ziff… [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
  From the USSC Report, page 1: The top five districts where illegal reentry offenses comprised the highest proportion of the overall caseload were: District of Arizona (59.7%); Southern District of Texas (52.4%); District of New Mexico (49.8%); Western District of Texas (44.6%); District of Delaware (20.3%). [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 10:55 am by jonathanturley
In Washington, the Supreme Court gave a chilly reception to the disqualification effort that bordered on the glacial. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by Katherine Drabiak
Currently, TST offers the services only to patients in New Mexico, but it plans to expand into other states. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:39 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
The current community property states are Wisconsin, California, Louisiana, Nevada, Washington, Texas, Arizona, Idaho, and New Mexico. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
 To be sure, the Colorado Supreme Court has declared that Colorado law requires the Secretary of State to exclude Trump’s name from the presidential primary election ballot (though as I explained here, that’s not happening, either—it’s too late for that now). [read post]