Search for: "Supreme Court of South Carolina" Results 61 - 80 of 4,525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2013, 10:06 am by Gregory Forman
 Barbara appealed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals which, pursuant to SCACR 244, certified the question of whether South Carolina recognizes the putative spouse doctrine to the South Carolina Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 11:36 am by Legal Profession Prof
The South Carolina Supreme Court imposed a six-month suspension for misconduct in two matters. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
For the US Supreme Court, the jumbled South Carolina opinions were "ambiguous" and "difficult to discern", but in the South Carolina Circuit Court, just one day later, all was suddenly "clear. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 11:06 am by Nonprofit Blogger
My thanks to Evelyn Brody for bringing the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision in Wilson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 11:13 am by Christian Stegmaier
Stegmaier is an appellate lawyer in Columbia with an active practice before the South Carolina Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 8:57 am by Stephen S. Asay
In two posts earlier this year—South Carolina May No Longer Hold Insurers’ Reservations and The Insurer’s Mixed-Coverage Burden—we told you about an important decision issued by the South Carolina Supreme Court in Harleysville Group Insurance v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 10:18 am
(Supreme Court of South Carolina, September 14, 2009) As an issue of first impression in South Carolina was whether a policy's inclusion of an advertising injury also encompassed trademark infringement claims pertaining to educational materials for children. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:27 am by Legal Profession
The South Carolina Supreme Court has disbarred an attorney for criminal conduct that took place in Montana: On or about May 5, 2005, respondent was charged by information with two (2) counts of Assault with a Weapon (Felony) and one... [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:32 am by Legal Profession Prof
The South Carolina Supreme Court has found that an attorney had failed to supervise employees in connection with a part of a massive misappropriation but declined to publicly identify the admonished attorney. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:30 am by Mary Giorgi
In an opinion authored by Chief Justice Jean Toal, the South Carolina Supreme Court agreed with Ford and found that the trial court committed prejudicial error in allowing evidence at trial that did not meet the threshold admissibility requirements in South Carolina. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 12:48 pm by Futeral & Nelson, LLC
Constitutional Limitations on Grandparent Rights in South Carolina While grandparents rights in South Carolina are laid out in South Carolina Code § 63-3-530, the United States Supreme Court has set some limitations on what a family court judge may decide. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 12:48 pm by Futeral & Nelson, LLC
Constitutional Limitations on Grandparent Rights in South Carolina While grandparents rights in South Carolina are laid out in South Carolina Code § 63-3-530, the United States Supreme Court has set some limitations on what a family court judge may decide. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:52 pm by Lyle Denniston
State officials in South Carolina notified a federal appeals court Monday that they plan to ask the Supreme Court to hear an appeal on the issue of same-sex marriage, in advance of any decision by the appeals court. [read post]
21 May 2020, 12:34 pm by Patrick E. Knie
The post South Carolina Supreme Court Holds that Insurance Company Had No Duty to Offer UIM Coverage Despite Modifications to Motorcycle Accident Policy appeared first on South Carolina Personal Injury Law Blog. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 8:16 am by Steven D. Schwinn
The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled yesterday that the state's ban on abortion after six weeks of pregnancy violated the state constitution's right to privacy. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
The Episcopal Church, (SC Common Pleas, June 19, 2020), a South Carolina trial court was called upon to interpret a confusing decision by the South Carolina Supreme Court in a long-running property dispute that arose after a split in the Episcopal Church in South Carolina. [read post]