Search for: "Supreme People's Court Monitor" Results 61 - 80 of 1,044
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2015, 4:54 am by Timothy P. Flynn
And now, perhaps by the Chancellor's design, here comes his 15-minutes of ill-conceived fame.In denying the requested relief upon completion of the proofs, the Chancellor stated that because of the SCOTUS decision in Obergefell v Hodges, the Supreme Court now needed to clarify, "when a marriage is no longer a marriage. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:39 am by David J. DePaolo
Thursday's US Supreme Court ruling in National Federation of Independent Business, et al vs. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 12:32 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
He heard only civil cases on the Texas Supreme Court, so he's only now confronting some of these issues as a judge.Robot judges? [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:22 am by Ken
Yes, yes, I know that it doesn't necessarily mean anything when the Supreme Court denies cert on a case. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 5:30 am by Joy
StorybooksTrump says he'll take inauguration oath indoors Monday due to cold temperaturesHarm reduction advocates hope high court will ';clarify' Canada's 'Good Samaritan' lawPrince Harry’s Suit Against Rupert Murdoch’s U.K. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Letting the jury see a criminal defendant's shackles (the Supreme Court has said) is inherently prejudicial. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 2:16 pm
The city's code allows up to three unrelated people to live together in areas zoned residential. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 3:30 pm by Joe Patrice
It's good to know that with a 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court they're still owning that persecution complex. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:59 am by Clare Feikert-Ahalt
This weeks' interview is with Judith Gaskell, former Librarian of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:53 pm
The most recent case cited in the Reporter Note as supporting medical monitoring is seven years old, and the Supreme Court decision in Metro-North Commuter R. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm by Paul Ohm
This morning, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm by Charley Moore
Related articles Supreme Court: Warrant Needed For GPS Tracking (baltimore.cbslocal.com) Supreme Court unanimously rules warrants required for GPS tracking (venturebeat.com) Police need warrant for GPS tracking, high court rules (news.cnet.com) {lang: ';ar'} [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 7:51 am
A new poll by a New Hampshire newspaper finds growing support for reforming the state's tax system-- and for letting the state supreme court continue to act as a watchdog over the right to an adequate education.That's the glass-half-full story from the Concord Monitor's coverage of this new poll. [read post]
" We are asking the Supreme Court to hold that the government needs to establish probable cause and obtain a warrant before attaching a GPS device to a person's car and tracking their every move. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:37 am by Eugene Volokh
This new article of mine will be coming out next year in the Journal of Law and Religion, and I thought I'd serialize it here; there's still plenty of time for editing, so I'd love to hear people's feedback. [read post]
25 Apr 2025, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In exchange for pretrial release, San Francisco's Superior Court imposes restrictive electronic and warrantless monitoring of some criminal suspects. [read post]