Search for: "Sweeny v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2009, 8:09 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 6:42 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:41 am
Amalfitano v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 12:15 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 12:29 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:01 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 1:34 am
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:44 am
Mazzarelli, J.P., Marlow, Buckley, Sweeny, Kavanagh, JJ. ... [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 1:56 pm
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:01 am
Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, McGuire, Renwick, ... [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Holiday v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:55 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 1:23 pm
The ruling in Anonymous v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 6:31 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 1:53 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:43 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 12:51 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
Decided on December 22, 2009 Sweeny, J.P., Catterson, Renwick, Freedman, Abdus-Salaam, JJ. 1847 117179/07 [*1]Ted Moustakis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Christie’s, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am
However, the Court of Appeals instructs that FOIL is to be "liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:32 pm
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
