Search for: "Sweeten v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am by J. Gordon Hylton
When not coaching the Cavaliers, Heikkinen divided his time between his legal studies and his involvement with the University of Virginia’s Flight Preparatory School which was established as part of the United States Navy’s V-12 program during the Second World War. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:35 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana – Plaintiff Heartland Consumer Products LLC of Carmel, Indiana filed an intellectual property lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging trademark and trade dress infringement, trademark dilution and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, as well as related wrongdoing under the Indiana State Trademark Act, the common law of the State of Indiana and the Indiana Crime Victims Act. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:46 pm
Pulse Electronics and Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Writing for the Brookings Institution, Lisa V. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:47 pm by Ad Law Defense
** FDA concludes its study on “Evaporated Cane Juice” – issues guidance that it is a misleading description for mere Sugar… [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:35 am by Nicholas Gebelt
 Chapter 11 Bankruptcy   The Bankruptcy Code (title 11 of the United States Code) is divided up into chapters. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:47 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
As Chinese president Xi Jinping and his Taiwanese counterpart Ma Ying-jeou prepare for a historic meeting in Singapore on Saturday, the Times takes a look at Beijing’s failed efforts to sweeten its relationship with Taipei through economic partnership. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Connection between liquid sugar consumption and greater health problems v. solid food. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:09 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
This decision, The Clorox Company Puerto Rico v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:55 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee’s Title VII and ADEA pay discrimination claims were reinstated as well (Riser v. [read post]