Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 61 - 80 of 4,705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2020, 7:15 am by Adam Levitin
Chapter 7 has no provision for payment of attorneys' fees, so consumers who are unable to save up for bankruptcy don't have any real option other than chapter 13. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a constitutional challenge to the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am by Camilla Hrdy
Consumers are supposed to get to make up their own minds about what 'satisfies their needs.' (The examples in the beauty industry abound. [read post]
When consumers see a Nike shoe, for example, the Nike name, Swoosh logo, and “Just Do It” tag line tell consumers that the shoe doesn’t come from Adidas, New Balance, or any other manufacturer – it only comes from Nike. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
Ruling under the consumer fraud statutes of New York and New Jersey, the court pointed out that not only wasn't the drug harmful - but these plaintiffs still took it, even after filing suit:I cannot come up with any theory u [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am by Florian Mueller
"She didn't specify, and all that she clarified it doesn't mean is that it's not outcome-determinative in the Epic v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 2:53 pm
Even if Nemet can't use its records to validate the facts in a consumer review, ConsumerAffairs.com's fabrication of the post is only one of many possible explanations. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:23 pm by Josh Wright
  A consumer choice standard doesn’t move the ball forward on any of those margins. [read post]