Search for: "T. C. v. C. E."
Results 61 - 80
of 8,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
Because obtaining a stay requires a petitioner to show “a reasonable probability that th[e] court will grant certiorari,” this one has a decent chance – you might even say a reasonable probability — of being granted. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
§ 1512) that was at issue in yesterday's oral argument in Fischer v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
My thinking, from my e-mail to the PolitiFact writer (which was largely quoted in the post): [1.] [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:05 pm
I attended oral arguments in the case Snyder v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
Corner Post got this case to the Supreme Court by alleging a circuit split between Herr v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:58 am
Y por ello, este novísimo acto (que no será controlado en ejecución de sentencia) tiene ventajas e inconvenientes para la Administración. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:11 am
That the risk of the petitioner repeating the act of operating a motor vehicle while impaired by, or under the influence of, alcohol or controlled substances or a combination of alcohol and a controlled substance or repeating any other offense listed in section 303(1)(d), (e), or (f) or (2)(c), (d), (e), or (f) of the act is a low or minimal risk. iv. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
Dep’t of Econ. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Tal como nas fórmulas do patético de Aby Warburg, não se distingue nelas criação e performance, original e cópia. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Some of the first remanded cases went to the District of Oregon, where they landed in front of Judge Robert E. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
However, the world isn’t this simple.[14] The complexity of social reality intrudes, even as a business may legitimately focus on its own economic strategies, plans, operations, investments, and marketing with profit-making in mind. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 3:04 am
” Nicholson v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
See § 1014.04(1)(e), Fla. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
But that only highlights that Congress did not require "substantiality" in § 1391(e)(1)(A) and (C). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:33 pm
28; R. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm
When expert witnesses rely upon one or a few studies, which telegraph internal validity, this litigation strategy may provide the strongest evidence against the study’s being reasonably relied upon, or its providing “sufficient facts and data” to support an admissible expert witness opinion. [1] Daubert v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Bryan T. [read post]
