Search for: "T. Mitchell"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,681
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
" This argument, as Mitchell acknowledged, "clearly demonstrates that members of Congress can't hold offices" under the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
I don't think there is a good rationale given that this was compromise legislation. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
Trump lawyer Jonathan Mitchell rejected the notion that the violent assault on the U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
But I don’t think that this Court should take those threats too seriously in its resolution of this case. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
“This was a riot, it was not an insurrection,” Mitchell responded. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
” asked Physicians for Human Rights researcher and attorney, Joanna Naples-Mitchell. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
But Mitchell and Trump won't need to rely on this theory if they can win on self-enforcement, as now seems probable. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 12:14 pm
It “just doesn’t seem like a state call,” she concluded. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
After hearing the two competing explanations, “[t]he jury thus found beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendant’s testimony was not credible by finding him guilty of felony child abuse inflicting serious bodily injury. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
You will be hearing arguments from: Jonathan Mitchell, who is representing Trump. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:52 pm
“You couldn’t see the lines anymore. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
(And the fact that Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell doesn’t make any effort to defend this argument should tell you something about its prospects.) [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 2:17 am
Doesn't the fist let slip that a cease fire is wanted so that the struggle can continue? [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
Some might question Mitchell’s judgment in dropping those arguments, particularly the one concerning whether the violence at the Capitol was an “insurrection. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Trump is represented in the Supreme Court by Jonathan Mitchell, the architect of Texas’s controversial six-week abortion ban. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Mitchell McCluskey reports for CNN. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am
I’ll offer some thoughts about why Mitchell has foregone these arguments and about why the Court should avoid opining on them. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 9:03 pm
I don’t know what that company is yet. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am
” Mitchell McCluskey, Housam Ahmed, and Sarah El Sirgany report for CNN. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
I am honored to be delivering the Alan B. [read post]
