Search for: "TAYLOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 61 - 80
of 155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
No. 08 Civ. 7810 (LTS)(JCF).United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the District of Columbia Abedini v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the District of Columbia Abedini v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
See com Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-8777, Taylor v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:01 am
British Columbia Ferry Corp. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 5:46 am
The case is Matthew Fulks v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:06 am
So, for example, in BMW of North America v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:00 am
In the case, Woodward v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
CAS Medical Systems, Inc (Docket Report) District Court M D Pennsylvania: Conflicting claim constructions preclude finding of wilfulness: Arlington Industries v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
CAS Medical Systems, Inc (Docket Report) District Court M D Pennsylvania: Conflicting claim constructions preclude finding of wilfulness: Arlington Industries v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:19 pm
The Case: - Two-JD couple, solid credentials: Georgetown (cum laude) and NYU Law for her; Columbia and HLS (both magna) for him. - The groom is an associate at WilmerHale, where he worked on an amicus brief filed in Kennedy v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:15 am
A lawsuit filed late last year against a major media company in California, Taylor v. [read post]
