Search for: "TAYLOR v. UNION COUNTY"
Results 61 - 80
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2010, 9:42 am
In 2003, a California Appellate Court held that, even if the plaintiff cannot recover damages from the Navy, the Navy is an entity to whom the jury can allocate “fault” (Taylor v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
*** In some instances a probationary employee may have a contractual right to challenge his or her termination as set out in a Taylor Law agreement. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:10 am
” After reviewing the duties and responsibilities of the position of stenographer then held by Lorraine Fishman, the Suffolk County Civil Service Commission advised the Patchogue-Medford Union Free School District that it had reclassified the position to senior stenographer. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:20 pm
And Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Chambers v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:43 am
Georges] Avenue (Route 27), Linden, Union County, NJ. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
In addition, Marshall agreed to resign from his union position and to "never again serve as a union officer. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
Nealon of Lackawanna County in the case of Moses Taylor Foundation v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am
Clayton County. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:14 am
Co. v Beau Rivage Rest., supra at 102; see also McKie v Taylor, 146 AD2d 921 [1989]).'[Id.]. [read post]
8 May 2008, 9:24 am
Since then, the Nevada stay has remained in effect.The lethal injection index, with full coverage of Baze v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 10:23 pm
The second is the date of their seniority with respect to their coworkers at the private enterprise at the time of the takeover.Collective bargaining agreements: As noted earlier, another difficulty may arise as a result of an employer's efforts to comply with "layoff provisions" contained in a Taylor Law agreement.As the Plattsburgh decision indicates, [Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045], statutory seniority rights for the purposes of layoff may neither be… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:12 am
Vacating an arbitration award based on allegations that the arbitrator was not impartialMeehan v Nassau Community College, App. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Click the button below to pay your registration fee with your credit card via PayPal: As the Appellate noted in Brady v New York County Dist. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
Aug. 29,2008)(Jefferson) (insurance coverage, duty to defend)ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AND NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
