Search for: "TITLE COURT SERVICES, INC." Results 61 - 80 of 3,667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2009, 7:41 am
Trade Policy, January 13, 2009; Pay Discrimination Claims Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act: A Legal Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:29 pm by Mark Litwak
The reason is that trademarks are used to identify the origin of goods or services. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:04 am by Mark Murakami
Stevedoring Services of America, Inc., original opinion can be downloaded here. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 3:03 am by Jane Meacham, Contributing Editor
The post Federal Court Rules Against Naming Service Provider in Fiduciary Responsibility Case appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 3:03 am by Jane Meacham, Contributing Editor
The post Federal Court Rules Against Naming Service Provider in Fiduciary Responsibility Case appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 10:11 pm by Jessica Mendelson
PCCare247, Inc., the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) sued multiple defendants, including five based in India. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Sarah Andropoulos
The district court granted the college’s motion to dismiss on the grounds that Title VII’s non-discrimination protections do not include sexual orientation.The Seventh Circuit is the first federal appellate court to have considered a Title VII sexual orientation discrimination claim since the 2015 EEOC decision. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:48 pm by Adam Levitin
National Default Servicing, Inc., another unanimous decision. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 2:10 am by Randall Reese
The first case is the chapter 11 case of Cargo Transportation Services, Inc. which was filed on Wednesday in the Middle District of Florida. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:20 am by Mack Sperling
Yesterday, the Business Court entered an important Order, titled "Order Regarding Notice of Designation and Assignment," in Southern Fastening Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 8:11 am
As to defending the Village's slander of title suit, "title to real estate is not a person, organization good, product, or service as those terms are commonly understood," thus, slander of title did not fall within the policy coverage of a good, product, or service as those terms are commonly understood," thus, slander of title did not fall within the policy coverage defendant provided to plaintiff. [read post]