Search for: "Tam v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2007, 8:02 am
Earlier this week, the qui tam case of United States ex. rel.Louanne Boothe v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 11:30 am
Petitioners counter that this is not true: indeed, because states are the original source of state reports and audits, they could bring qui tam actions themselves. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:25 am
Tam, formerly Lee v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:29 am
Hutcheson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:44 am
Lusby v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 10:56 am
I was speaking to a thoughtful, insightful person last night who asked me, “What if Simon Tam wins in Lee v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 2:15 pm
The Department of Justice announced the settlement on August 17, 2017, of two qui tam cases pending in the District of Massachusetts, United States, et al. ex rel. sanofi-aventis US LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 12:00 pm
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments on Tuesday in Cochise Consultancy, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 11:40 am
Goldman v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:03 pm
Scott v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:07 am
By Jonathan Hunter: In a highly anticipated decision, the Tenth Circuit held this week that the district court had subject matter jurisdiction over a qui tam action filed by an MMS auditor concerning royalty payments on crude oil produced from offshore federal leases. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:33 am
District Court in Arizona recently sanctioned the attorneys for the relator in the qui tam case of United States ex rel Jerre Frazier v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 1:09 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:18 am
McCoy v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 9:55 am
Cokus v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:31 pm
Steven Radjenovich v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 10:09 am
I was going to do a post collecting all the briefs filed in the United States Supreme Court in Lee v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:07 am
United State ex rel. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 5:17 am
In the case of Stalley v. [read post]