Search for: "Tan Hi v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2012, 8:44 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
” Resolution 1165 was quoted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the 1994 Von Hannover v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by William Melater
The defendant will claim the onus is on the plaintiff, who lives in the United States, filed a claim in the United States and intends to testify, presumably in English or through her own translator, at the eventual trial. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
 Lynn said that the webinar would cover the:  Overview and analysis of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) Decision. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:02 am by Jeff Gamso
  By a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth (hey, some things are maybe predictable) Circuit, the Honorable William A. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:59 am
The factual background in Starglade Properties v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Several months after the patent had lapsed, Shore-Sirotin learned from Honig that the patent was licensed, and immediately sent an e-mail dated March 19, 2002, referencing the patent and its United Kingdom analogue, to Pat Tormey, an Abelman legal assistant, stating, "[P]lease do NOT DROP these patents in the U.S ... [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm by Marie Louise
‘Initial interest confusion’ part of EU trade mark law, says judge – EWCH decision in Och-Ziff Management Europe Ltd & Anor v Och Capital LLP & Anor (IPKat) Rooney: will his image rights income wax or wayne? [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm by Rosalind English
It was recognised that deportation would probably entail the resumption by the claimant of his anti-UK terrorist-related activities, and the secretary of state’s preference was that upon his return to Iraq he should be detained, if legally possible, either by the Iraqi authorities or by multinational or United States forces. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:49 am
  Even worse, it allows a defense attorney who does not know immigration law to merely remain silent, and fail to advise his client about what may be the most important factor in his decision to plead guilty.Although deportation has long been considered a "drastic measure," (see Fong Haw Tan v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:03 pm by Carter Ruml
Clement Attlee, Nov. 1945 (Archives Canada via Wikimedia Commons) Its detractors might see the bill as a reprise of Wickard v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
Indeed, the United States argues that “Officer Perez . . . did not know that he had a duty to diligently pursue the drafting and eventual approval of the warrant by a detached magistrate. [read post]