Search for: "Taylor v. Commissioner"
Results 61 - 80
of 348
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am
E.U. energy commissioner Kadri Simson has announced that a sixth package of E.U. sanctions against Russia in response to its invasion of Ukraine is expected “very soon”. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 28 February 2022, the claimant’s case was dismissed in Taylor v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 149. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:52 pm
We reject Sawant's argument that this case is controlled by New York Times Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
The hearings, "Protection from Persecution: Establishing Humanitarian Pathways for Hong Kongers and Uyghurs" is intended to be a "catalyst for passage of legislation offered in the 117th Congress to extend protections for Hong Kongers and Uyghurs facing a well-founded fear of persecution, including legislation offered by CECC Commissioners. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:57 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Per Capita Payments; Taxation) Eight petitions for certiorari were filed on 8/16/21:Oklahoma v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 6:48 pm
Reg. 82/20 of the Act in Hudson’s Bay Company ULC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:51 am
Llewellyn, Fenwick & West LLP, on Sunday, April 11, 2021 Tags: Board composition, Boards of Directors, California, Diversity, ESG, Human capital, Management, Tech companies Supreme Court to Weigh in on Presumption of Reliance in Securities Class Actions: Goldman Sachs v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm
On 24 February 2021, Saini J handed down judgment in a preliminary hearing on meaning in Ware v French [2021] EWHC 384 (QB). [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:47 pm
The Board’s reliance on Government of India v Taylor [1955] AC 491 (HL) in this context is unhelpful. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 10:09 am
See E.E.O.C. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 9:27 am
Taylor No. 104402558 Grant Dickinson, Attorney for Appellant Anthony C. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
Taylor, 2019 Cal. [read post]
