Search for: "Taylor v. Department of Revenue" Results 61 - 80 of 93
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 13 December 2018 Master Giddens gave an ex tempore judgment in the slander claim of Kenny v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Maher v Hayduk, 218 AD2d 700]Dismissal of a tenured elementary school principal with an “unblemished record for over 15 years” for failing to accurately track revenues and expenditures, and concealing deficits, while serving as a probationary Assistant Superintendent for Business. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Maher v Hayduk, 218 AD2d 700]Dismissal of a tenured elementary school principal with an “unblemished record for over 15 years” for failing to accurately track revenues and expenditures, and concealing deficits, while serving as a probationary Assistant Superintendent for Business. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
In an interesting opinion that includes among other things a noteworthy discussion of issues arising under the Morrison v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 9:20 am by Keith Mallinson
This is an excellent biennial event, organized this year by Professor Sir Robin Jacob of UCL Laws and James Marshall of Taylor Wessing. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On Wednesday 25 October 2023 there was a committal hearing in the case of Kent Police v Taylor before Steyn J. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Taylor, Professor of Law, University of Denver, Sturm College of Law—The Unsettled State of Compelled Corporate Disclosure Regulation After the Conflict Mineral Rule Cases Virginia Harper Ho, Associate Professor of Law, Kansas University School of Law—“Comply or Explain” and the Future of Nonfinancial Reporting James Coburn, Senior Manager, Investor Programs, Ceres—Climate Risk and Sustainability Disclosure   … [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
St Marylebone Property Co [1962] 2 WLR 1020 : [1962] 2 All ER 288 can be considered where House of Lords referring to Taylor v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
Second Taylor Wessing Global IP Index reviews 24 places to litigate patents (PatLit) Discussion of ‘IFI Patent Intelligence Analysis of 2008’s Top US-Patent Recipients Suggests America May be Losing Dominance: Companies Outside the U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
Second Taylor Wessing Global IP Index reviews 24 places to litigate patents (PatLit) Discussion of ‘IFI Patent Intelligence Analysis of 2008’s Top US-Patent Recipients Suggests America May be Losing Dominance: Companies Outside the U.S. [read post]