Search for: "Taylor v. Springs"
Results 61 - 80
of 150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
See King v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:00 pm
See Maia v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
County of Nassau, 86 NY2d 42)].This Doctrine, and a number of other significant public personnel law issues including the establishment of positions in the Classified Service by a political subdivision of the State, jurisdictional classification of positions in the Classified Service and the impact of a Taylor Law agreement in the event there is layoff of employees in the Labor Class, were considered by the Appellate Division in Chandler v Village of Spring Valley, 104… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
County of Nassau, 86 NY2d 42)].This Doctrine, and a number of other significant public personnel law issues including the establishment of positions in the Classified Service by a political subdivision of the State, jurisdictional classification of positions in the Classified Service and the impact of a Taylor Law agreement in the event there is layoff of employees in the Labor Class, were considered by the Appellate Division in Chandler v Village of Spring Valley, 104… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
County of Nassau, 86 NY2d 42)].This Doctrine, and a number of other significant public personnel law issues including the establishment of positions in the Classified Service by a political subdivision of the State, jurisdictional classification of positions in the Classified Service and the impact of a Taylor Law agreement in the event there is layoff of employees in the Labor Class, were considered by the Appellate Division in Chandler v Village of Spring Valley, 104… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
County of Nassau, 86 NY2d 42)].This Doctrine, and a number of other significant public personnel law issues including the establishment of positions in the Classified Service by a political subdivision of the State, jurisdictional classification of positions in the Classified Service and the impact of a Taylor Law agreement in the event there is layoff of employees in the Labor Class, were considered by the Appellate Division in Chandler v Village of Spring Valley, 104… [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 2:00 am
Sholes v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 11:27 pm
She is a professor in the Faculty of Law, Faculty of Medicine and the Joint Centre for Bioethics at the University of Toronto; and Co-Director, International Reproductive and Sexual Health Law Programme and University of Toronto.Fred V. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 9:30 am
Glenn; same) and (Taylor v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 7:01 am
Taylor (N.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:06 am
See Garcetti v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:15 pm
App. 1997) (lease termination for illegal activity) Taylor v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
See Naranjo v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979) Taylor v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 7:01 am
B.L., and People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
On 5 April 2016 Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of EZE Group Ltd v Taylor Marshall Ltd, (heard 23 March 2017) Events 28 April 2017, “Conference on Freedom of Expression Online,” Nicosia, Filoxenia Conference Centre, Cyprus Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Defteros v Google Inc & Anor [2017] VSC 158 John Dixon J granted summary judgment to Google Australia (Pty) Ltd in a defamation claim. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 3:37 am
The paddle is spring mounted and so when it meets the stationary bar, it is briefly slowed as the tension of the spring is taken up and then forced over the bar creating an acceleration as the tension is released. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Supreme Court held more than a decade ago in Swidler & Berlin v. [read post]
