Search for: "Terry v. Unknown" Results 61 - 80 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2012, 10:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  The term "Terry frisks" comes from the Supreme Court decision Terry v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
On 4 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the case of D v Persons Unknown [2021] EWHC 157 (QB). [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 9:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
On 5 November 2010  judgment was handed down in JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2010] EWHC 2818 (QB)) – Read judgment. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:51 am by INFORRM
She cited the judgment of Tugendhat J in Terry v Persons Unknown and in particular paragraph 139 in which he said: If a prohibition of the disclosure of the making of the injunction is included in an order for the purpose of preventing tipping off, and if the order provides for a return date (as the Practice Direction envisages) then the prohibition on disclosure may normally be expected to expire once the alleged wrongdoer has been served with an injunction, or at the… [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Injunctions Blog has a short post on the decision in Ineos Upstream Ltd & Ors v Persons Unknown & Ors [2017] EWHC 2945 (Ch) in which Morgan J continued quia timet injunctions against anti-fracking protestors. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
In Terry v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) Mr Justice Tugendhat expressed the view that privacy and defamation only overlap in a limited class of cases. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
 AAA plc & Ors v Persons Unknown [2021] EWHC 2529 (QB) (20 September 2021), Pepperall J granted an interim injunction to restrain allegations of fraud made by an attempted blackmailer. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
As the court made clear in Terry v Person Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)), any application for such derogation should be supported by evidence in an application. [read post]
Protestors were then filmed dancing on top of the Tomb of the Unknown Solder which lies in front of the memorial. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:30 am by INFORRM
In the interests of balance we should point out that although privacy cases are now usually the subject of public judgments the protection of sponsorship agreements has only been mentioned in one case – Terry v Persons Unknown where it was a matter of untested judicial inference rather than being proved. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:14 am by INFORRM
The ingredients for an action for breach of confidence, summarised in Terry v Persons Unknown ([2010] EMLR 16) were that the information had the necessary quality of confidence, was imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence, and that unauthorised use or disclosure was threatened, the judge went on. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:55 am by INFORRM
As to whether there is consensus, it is noticeable that in the recent case of Terry (originally LNS) v Persons Unknown [2010] EWHC 119 (QB), Tugendhat J considered that “damages may be an adequate remedy in some cases, if not in all”, and that “if the law is broken, there is a remedy in damages for the distress that is caused” [127-129]. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The difference between the two causes of action can be critical, as John Terry found to his cost: Terry (formerly LNS) v Persons Unknown [2010] EMLR 16 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  In X & Y v Persons Unknown ([2007] 1 FLR 1567 at [42]-[49]). [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am by John Rubin
Whether known or unknown by the defendant, such threats show the victim’s intent. [read post]