Search for: "Terry v. Unknown"
Results 61 - 80
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2010, 10:21 am
Salzburg, Wyoming Attorney General; Terry L. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 9:55 pm
On 5 November 2010 judgment was handed down in JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2010] EWHC 2818 (QB)) – Read judgment. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:53 am
The short message of this case is to reinforce the point that Mr Justice Tugendhat made in Terry v Persons Unknown - the court will, in each privacy case, need to be properly satisfied that the interests of the public in open justice have been properly taken into account in re [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
The difference between the two causes of action can be critical, as John Terry found to his cost: Terry (formerly LNS) v Persons Unknown [2010] EMLR 16 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
As the court made clear in Terry v Person Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)), any application for such derogation should be supported by evidence in an application. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:52 pm
REW [2009] EMLR 304 at [18]-[19] and Terry v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 5:41 am
What is particularly striking is how this outcome appears to conflict with the cautionary tale that is the judgment in the injunction application of John Terry (LNS v Persons Unknown [2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) and in particular the references to the relationship. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:18 am
In this case (unlike the decision in Terry v Persons Unknown), the claimant denied the allegations of an extra-marital affair and further filed evidence that the Defendant was seeking to blackmail him. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:49 pm
These issues were considered in the judgment in Terry v Persons Unknown by Tugendhat J earlier this year. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
” [76-77] In McKennitt v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 6:26 pm
Footnote: the John Terry injunction: In a previous post I mentioned that the terms of the judgment in the now notorious case of Terry v Persons unknown indicated that the interim Injunction was not a so-called superinjunction. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
There’s a ConstitutionDay.com website (by parties unknown), “recognizing all who, are born in the U.S. or by naturalization, have become citizens. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:36 am
Second, there is the suggestion – largely based on one judgment (Terry (formerly LNS) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) – that Mr Justice Tugendhat is going to be more “media friendly” as the judge in charge of the jury list. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:20 am
In his 2010 judgment in Terry (formerly LNS) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB), [2010] EMLR 16) Mr Justice Tugendhat dismissed a claim for a super-injunction by the then England football captain John Terry, taking the opportunity to conduct a wide ranging survey of the relevant law and to criticise the approach of the claimant’s lawyers. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
This established the basis for a racialized slavery, hereby unknown to Africa or any region engaging in African slave trade. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
In the recent case of Terry (previously ‘LNS’) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) the court addressed the inter-relationship between two principles: the principle that the court may grant an interim injunction to restrain a threatened misuse of private information where the claimant can show that his claim is (at least) more likely than not to succeed, and the rule in Bonnard v Perryman ([1891] 2 Ch 269 (CA)) whereby the court almost invariably… [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
As to whether there is consensus, it is noticeable that in the recent case of Terry (originally LNS) v Persons Unknown [2010] EWHC 119 (QB), Tugendhat J considered that “damages may be an adequate remedy in some cases, if not in all”, and that “if the law is broken, there is a remedy in damages for the distress that is caused” [127-129]. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:30 am
In Flux v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:55 am
” John Terry decision The decision of Mr Justice Tugendhat in the case of Terry v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB))has been interpreted by some sections of the media as a significant “reverse” step for privacy law. [read post]
