Search for: "Texas Instruments, Inc. v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Vaseliou of the bar of the State of Texas, admitted pro hac vice of counsel), for Parents Defending Education, respondent.The New York Civil Liberties Union, New York (Stefanie D. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am by MOTP
This deed of trust does not waive the tax liens, and the tax liens and the lien and rights created by this instrument shall be cumulative. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 3:30 am by Ronald Mann
Americold Realty Trust v ConAgra Foods, Inc. presents just the kind of question I might have faced on a final examination in that course: in what states is a trust a “citizen” for purposes of diversity jurisdiction? [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am by Merpel McKitten
As noted, in 2005, Nokia and Ericsson joined with other suppliers of baseband chipsets, including Broadcom and Texas Instruments, to file complaints with the European Commission about Qualcomm’s refusal to license essential patents to potential chipset competitors on FRAND terms. 10  And in 2006, Nokia argued to the European Commission that Qualcomm’s termination of a license with Texas Instruments “would breach Qualcomm’s duty to… [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
Texas court improperly applied “a special, heightened burden of proof. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am by John Coyle
Meanwhile, lower courts struggled with how to fit the Supreme Court’s 1922 decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: False marking intent to deceive may be inferred from marking of expired patent numbers: Patent Compliance Group Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:48 am by Sean Mirski, Shira Anderson
Sovereign states, along with their agencies and instrumentalities, are as a general matter immune from suit in the United States under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA). [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) MKS Instrument – Motion to transfer denied in infringement case: Brooks Instrument v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed patent was the subject of prior… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other… [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by Kelly
Kappos (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court E D Texas: A bridge too far: Following jury verdict of infringement and invalidity defendant failed to show inequitable conduct by clear and convincing evidence: Mettler-Toledo, Inc v. [read post]