Search for: "Thames v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
”And finally, the usual passage from Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 [at 51] is aired:a decision can often survive despite the existence of an error in the reasoning advanced to support it. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
”And finally, the usual passage from Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 [at 51] is aired:a decision can often survive despite the existence of an error in the reasoning advanced to support it. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
The river Thames prevents a direct journey and transport links go either through Stratford or Central London. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
The river Thames prevents a direct journey and transport links go either through Stratford or Central London. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:41 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Dixon, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2163 (05 October 2012) Ferriter, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2211 (03 October 2012) Matthews, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2154 (27 September 2012) Williamson, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2114 (02 August 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Whiston, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 1374 (25 October 2012) Davies & Ors v Secretary of… [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 1:07 am
Brit Inns' insurer paid out £205,500, and Thames Water, responsible for the flood, contributed a further £50,000. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm by Buce
 "He could wish himself in Thames up to the neck," observes the common soldier John Bates. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm by Buce
 "He could wish himself in Thames up to the neck," observes the common soldier John Bates. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
However, in principle, the question of negligence is a matter for the Claimants to establish but the question of inevitability is, as stated in Manchester Corp v Farnworth for Thames Water to establish. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
However, in principle, the question of negligence is a matter for the Claimants to establish but the question of inevitability is, as stated in Manchester Corp v Farnworth for Thames Water to establish. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 1:52 pm by NL
As an illustration of how complex housing law has become, and how difficult for a litigant in person, comes Sheppard v London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames [2012] EWCA Civ 302. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 1:52 pm by NL
As an illustration of how complex housing law has become, and how difficult for a litigant in person, comes Sheppard v London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames [2012] EWCA Civ 302. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by NL
Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] 1 WLR 413, at [50] and [51].Soon after, Lewisham decided not to contest the appeal, on the stated (and very familiar) grounds that the decision was “based on the taking of an economic view of the likely costs of resisting the appeal”. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by NL
Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] 1 WLR 413, at [50] and [51].Soon after, Lewisham decided not to contest the appeal, on the stated (and very familiar) grounds that the decision was “based on the taking of an economic view of the likely costs of resisting the appeal”. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:10 am by Rosalind English
Shortly afterwards G was involved in a group attack on a man, which led to the unconscious victim being thrown into the Thames and drowned. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am by Melina Padron
Dobson & Ors v Thames Water Utilities Ltd (No 2) [2011] EWHC 3253 (TCC) (08 December 2011) December 28, 2011 Thames Water caused nuisance and breached human rights of residents living next to sewage works who suffered odour and mosquitoes over many years. [read post]