Search for: "The Florida Bar v. Morales" Results 61 - 80 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Stat. section 3126(a)(8), a strict liability offense, is a crime involving moral turpitude because the offense combines a reprehensible act with deliberate conduct. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-8058, Castaneda-Morales v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 11:01 am by Ilya Somin
Perry, which ruled that the Amendment does not bar a (likely racist) Florida law forcing people to work on roads. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
The court however affirmed the trial court's dismissal of plaintiff's First Amendment and Equal Protection claims and of the lower court's holding that sovereign immunity barred damage actions against defendants in their official capacities.In Adekoya v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:11 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
And other foolishness from the Florida Bar: Real Lawyers Have Blogs Ontario Court of Appeal recognizes invasion of privacy as common law tort - Financial Post U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:46 am by Patrick Quinlan
One of those 31 states is Florida, which has only a general statute allowing a court to consider “the moral fitness of the parents” and “evidence of domestic violence” in deciding questions of parental rights, but no specific law delineating the consequences of rape. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm by CAPTAIN
In 1954, the United States Supreme Court ordered the public schools desegregated "with all deliberate speed" by 1956 in Brown v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Mukasey, No. 071114 In an immigration appeal, petition for review of decision ordering petitioner's removal is denied where first degree larceny in the form of "defrauding a public community" is a crime involving moral turpitude. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The Florida Act bars professors from "espous[ing], promot[ing], or advan­c[ing]," Fla. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
Callahan's motion is not an emergency filing; Callahan has not had the benefit of extensive state court hearings establishing a factual record; Callahan did not wait until two days before his execution to file his case; Callahan's claim is not barred by laches; and the Alabama protocol is different than Florida's in several material respects. [read post]