Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2024, 11:16 am
In People v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 5:19 am
People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:48 am
A settlement has been reached in Stinson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 4:12 pm
As we reported recently, the Government Accountability Office has determined that CFPB Bulletin 2013-02 on dealer pricing in indirect auto finance (“Dealer Pricing Bulletin” or “Bulletin”) is a “rule” subject to review under the Congressional Review Act (“CRA”). [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 1:40 pm
People v. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 6:29 am
William McDougald v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 11:29 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:01 am
[He still has a capital murder conviction as to the other victims.]Judges Price and Womack concurred to explain why they vote to overrule Norris v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 12:04 pm
Our medical marijuana lawyers would bet that the people of California didn't vote for medical marijuana so that the people who needed it would be hurt by inflated prices. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 4:28 pm
Minn-Chem, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:53 pm
A very painful price. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:48 am
Gorsuch, who joined the court in 2017, wrote the dissent.The class-action lawsuit focuses on the fees that Apple takes on sales in its App Store, which millions of people use every day to download games, messaging apps and other programs. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:34 pm
Under this sales tax framework, the addition of sales tax reimbursement to the cost of an item is an indication of that item’s fair market value: the total and highest price to which the willing buyer and seller agree. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:48 pm
Portillo claim that at the trial, the only evidence of this fact came from nonadmissible hearsay, when the warehouse manager testified at trial that these were the prices he saw when he looked up the dumbbells online.Resulting, today, in a 45-page opinion that an evidence professor would drool over, in which Justice Feuer thinks that the testimony was admissible nonhearsay for one reason, whereas Justice Segal believes that it is admissible nonhearsay for a different reason. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:15 pm
The price depended on the quantity available and quality. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Cuomo v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:38 am
People are allowed to be ignorant. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:18 am
But as the reflected in the Third Circuit’s decision in McGann v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
People ex rel. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 11:09 pm
In fact, I think many people would thank you. [read post]
